Notes
Outline
GSC2.2 vs SDSS EDR:
Astrometry, Photometry, Classification
We present a comparison of the Sloan Digital Sky Survey Early Data Release, covering 460 square degrees of sky in five bands, and the Guide Star Catalogue 2.2, covering the entire sky in two bands, both released in June 2001.
The GSC2.2, while somewhat shallower and with fewer bands than the SDSS, covers the entire sky with data having at least comparable astrometric accuracy to SDSS, and with photometric and classification accuracies suitable for many scientific projects.
Source  Properties
Bandpasses
Matched catalog sample
GSC2.2 and SDSS objects were retrieved over the internet. GSC2 objects were matched to SDSS based on position with a 2” or 5” search radius.
Astrometric and photometric comparisons were performed for objects classified as stellar by both catalogs, to avoid blurring results due to classification differences.
GSC2.2 plate-based effects were investigated by examining the 0° zone of the SDSS, where GSC2.2 plate boundaries can be easily discriminated by RA.
Astrometric Calibrations
Both SDSS and GSC2 positions are reported in the ICRF reference frame.
The GSC2.2 contains a single position for each object that was selected from all available observations. Selection was based on distance from plate center, to obtain the most reliable position.
SDSS-GSC2 position residuals for stars showed a significant difference in RA, inspiring a further comparison with FIRST.
FIRST positions, derived from radio data, provide an independent set of measurements in the ICRF reference frame.
FIRST vs GSC2.2 and SDSS
GSC2.2 astrometric plate effects
Photometric Calibrations
SDSS data, being linear, is easier to calibrate photometrically. However, GSC2 approaches SDSS accuracy for stars by means of a Chebyshev fit using the GSPC2, which contains photometric sequences of ~100 stars per plate to ~18th magnitude.
Galaxy photometry has been deferred to GSC2.3 due to resource limitations. Thus, GSC2.2 magnitudes for galaxies can be too bright by several magnitudes, since they were calibrated as if they were point sources.
The GSC2.2 contains a single magnitude per bandpass for each object that was selected from all available observations. Selection was based on distance from plate center, to avoid vignetted plate areas.
Photometric residuals vs Mag
Photometric residuals vs color
GSC2.2 photometric plate effects
Classification Techniques
Both SDSS and GSC2.2 discriminate between “stars” and “nonstars”, which may include blends.
Resolution (data) and crowdedness (sky) affect results: a pair of stars may appear blended on GSC2 material, and distinct on SDSS data. Thus not all disagreements are “errors”.
Unlike astrometry and photometry, classification results are based on all available plate data through a multi-plate voting scheme.
“High confidence” GSC2 classifications are identified by a nonzero value of the 7th digit of the source status flag, indicating unanimous agreement on all GSC2 plates.
Classification Performance Measures
Completeness and contamination are complementary measures of classification performance.
Completeness measures select a sample of known stars(/nonstars), and examine the percentage that are classified stellar(/nonstellar).
Contamination measures select a sample of objects that are classified stellar(/nonstellar), and examine the percentage that are known to be stars(/nonstars).
For this analysis, we take SDSS classifications as known, and perform both completeness measurements (on SDSS selected samples) and contamination measurements (on GSC2 selected samples).
GSC2.2 for SDSS stars
GSC2.2 for SDSS nonstars
SDSS for GSC2.2 stars & nonstars
GSC2.2 vs SDSS 0° and 60°
Classification Confusion Effects
Classification Plate Effects: agreement for SDSS stars
Acknowledgements & URLs
The Guide Star Catalogue is a joint project of the Space Telescope Science Institute and the Osservatorio Astronomico di Torino. Space Telescope Science Institute is operated by the Association of Universities for Research in Astronomy, for the National Aeronautics and Space Administration under contract NAS5-26555. The participation of the Osservatorio Astronomico di Torino is supported by the Italian Council for Research in Astronomy. Additional support is provided by European Southern Observatory, Space Telescope European Coordinating Facility, the International GEMINI project and the European Space Agency Astrophysics Division.
 Funding for the creation and distribution of the SDSS Archive has been provided by the Alfred P. Sloan Foundation, the Participating Institutions, the National Aeronautics and Space Administration, the National Science Foundation, the U.S. Department of Energy, the Japanese Monbukagakusho, and the Max Planck Society. The SDSS Web site is http://www.sdss.org/. The Participating Institutions are The University of Chicago, Fermilab, the Institute for Advanced Study, the Japan Participation Group, The Johns Hopkins University, the Max-Planck-Institute for Astronomy (MPIA), the Max-Planck-Institute for Astrophysics (MPA), New Mexico State University, Princeton University, the United States Naval Observatory, and the University of Washington.
Results presented in this poster will be available after the meeting at
 http://www-gsss.stsci.edu.